— ∞ − 0 − a + a + 0 =∞ (@necrobebe) November 14, 2016
//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js
It’s been a while since I saw this. Now amazed at how much it predicts.
— ∞ − 0 − a + a + 0 =∞ (@necrobebe) November 14, 2016
//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js
It’s been a while since I saw this. Now amazed at how much it predicts.
I guess there has to be a lot of this kind of thing going on (and more all the time):
She was researching viruses, hoping to identify a fatal one that would attack males only. She said that once males were eradicated, she planned to introduce chemical reproduction without sperm. Furthermore, women would no longer carry the fetus; rather, the process would take place in the laboratory. She chatted about this idea as if she were discussing the weather.
(Given that a Y-chromosome targeting system would select only males, while an X-chromosome version would be sex indiscriminate, there’s a definite implicit genius to the idea. Waiting for the aftermath of the androcide before getting down to serious work on a post-sexual reproduction system is seriously hardcore.)
Janet L Factor pursues harsh reality in Quillette:
Evolution is a numbers game. Personal intentions or happiness are beside the point. Natural selection is an algorithm that grinds out results based purely on physical inputs. Open a book on population genetics and you will quickly encounter pages of intimidating mathematics. Difficult as it is to accept that human destiny has been and will be decided by such an abstract, indifferent mechanism, it is the truth.